The Virtual Birder
The Virtual Birder ®
The Store
OnLocation
B-Mail
BIRDxxxx
BIRDCHAT
ID-FRONTIERS
BIRDHAWK
US:NewEngland
US:NewYork
US:MidAtlantic
US:South
US:MidWest
US:West
Canada
Families
Real Birds
Hot Links
Gallery
Media Shelf
Prizes
EdCentral
Rants & Raves
 
 
B-MAIL sm      
 

ID-FRONTIERS for May 1-4, 2002

[ Prev Week | Next Week | Calendar Month | ID-FRONTIERS Info ]

Messages are displayed in the order they were received.
 Subject From Date  Time 
 A juvenile Larus in March?  Floyd Hayes   Wed, 1 May 2002  2:53pm 
 Re: A juvenile Larus in March?  Bruce Mactavish   Wed, 1 May 2002  6:32pm 
 Re: A juvenile Larus in March?  Dick.newell  Wed, 1 May 2002  8:52pm 
 Re: A juvenile Larus in March ?  Peter Adriaens   Thu, 2 May 2002  3:47am 
 Couple of questions  KACastelein and DJLa  Thu, 2 May 2002  7:06am 
 Re: Couple of questions  John & Liz Walters   Thu, 2 May 2002  7:23am 
 Re: Couple of questions  Steven Mlodinow   Thu, 2 May 2002  11:08am 
 Re: Couple of questions  Joseph Morlan   Thu, 2 May 2002  12:13pm 
 Handbook to North American Birds  ian paulsen   Thu, 2 May 2002  2:19pm 
 QRY: Distinctive bill form shown by RN Stint?  JIm Barton   Thu, 2 May 2002  4:15pm 
 Dowitchers and Willow Flys  KACastelein and DJLa  Thu, 2 May 2002  10:25pm 
 flight call CD  Jeff McCoy   Thu, 2 May 2002  11:21pm 
 Re: A juvenile Larus in March ?  Martin Reid   Fri, 3 May 2002  6:22am 
 Re: flight call CD  Tony Leukering   Fri, 3 May 2002  7:26am 
 Re: A juvenile Larus in March ?  Nick Rossiter   Fri, 3 May 2002  10:12am 
 Beaman/ Madge book  ian paulsen   Fri, 3 May 2002  10:18am 
 MY QUESTION  ian paulsen   Fri, 3 May 2002  11:20am 
 Re: flight call CD  John C. Arvin  Fri, 3 May 2002  2:59pm 
 European & NA Field Guides  John Saba   Fri, 3 May 2002  7:11pm 
 Translation  Jean-Marc Lustrat   Sat, 4 May 2002  10:13am 
 Re: Translation  Michel Bertrand   Sat, 4 May 2002  10:56am 
To use email addresses replace '(AT)' with '@'.
This is done to confuse the spam 'bots.


[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: A juvenile Larus in March? From: Floyd Hayes <floyd_hayes(AT)HOTMAIL.COM> Date: 1 May 2002 2:53pm I'm sorry to bore the non-larid-aficionados again but Alvaro Jaramillo suggested last night that the photo of an assumed 1st-winter Lesser Black-backed Gull here in Trinidad in March looks like a juvenile and concluded "it has to be a southern hemisphere breeder, therefore a Kelp Gull." I've just uploaded scans of both sides of the gull along with zoomed in images of the head, wings, and tertials at: http://www.geocities.com/secaribbirds/ttmysterygull There were four such 1st-year gulls present that day and it's frighteningly easy to dismiss them all as LBBGs (some were very worn). Any thoughts from those familiar (unlike me) with juvenile LBBG and KEGU? I'll post comments anonymously unless you specify that you want to be identified with your comments. -Floyd >Perhaps the more interesting observation I have is of the first winter bird >photographed in March. If this photo is from March it can't be a Lesser >Black-backed Gull. At that time the feathering would have had about 8-9 >months of wearing and bleaching and would not look this fresh and uniform. >The bird pictured is a juvenile based on how fresh and crisp this bird it. >Given that its a juvenile in March, it has to be a southern hemisphere >breeder and therefore a Kelp Gull. In March its typical to see this plumage >stage in Chile/Argentina for example. Please pass on these opinions to >whoever you want. > >Alvaro Jaramillo >chucao(AT)attbi.com _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: A juvenile Larus in March? From: Bruce Mactavish <bruce.mactavish1(AT)NF.SYMPATICO.CA> Date: 1 May 2002 6:32pm A 1st winter Lesser Black-backed Gull-like gull with juvenile scapulars in March could be a Lesser Black-backed Gull. There is a 1st year Lesser Black-backed Gull in St. John's, Newfoundland that arrived October 2001 and is still present at the time of this writing. It retained 100% juvenile scapulars well into March and probably through March. On April 3O 80% of the scaps were still juvenile. The bird was easily followed through the winter because it lived at city pond stealing bread thrown out to tame ducks. Perhaps the diet was nutrient deficient enough to prevent moulting of scapulars. However, 1st winter Lesser Black-backed Gulls, even the ones with a rich diet of human garbage, retain many juvenile scapular into mid and late winter - much like smithsonianus. Juvenile scapulars of Lesser Black-backed Gulls are normally fairly uniform dark with a narrow, sharply defined pale fringe. The bird in question shows pale internal markings on the scapulars. This contrast could show up on 1st winter LBBG scapulars if the paler internal markings encompassed by the darker anchor shape mark were bleached by sunlight. The head shape, the bill shape and colour, the lower neck streaking, the primary projection - the over all jizz, is dead on for Lesser Black-backed Gull. Bruce Mactavish St. John's, Newfoundland Canada bruce.mactavish1(AT)nf.sympatico.ca -----Original Message----- From: NBHC ID-FRONTIERS Frontiers of Field Identification [mailto:BIRDWG01(AT)listserv.arizona.edu] On Behalf Of Floyd Hayes Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 7:23 PM To: BIRDWG01(AT)listserv.arizona.edu Subject: [BIRDWG01] A juvenile Larus in March? I'm sorry to bore the non-larid-aficionados again but Alvaro Jaramillo suggested last night that the photo of an assumed 1st-winter Lesser Black-backed Gull here in Trinidad in March looks like a juvenile and concluded "it has to be a southern hemisphere breeder, therefore a Kelp Gull." I've just uploaded scans of both sides of the gull along with zoomed in images of the head, wings, and tertials at: http://www.geocities.com/secaribbirds/ttmysterygull There were four such 1st-year gulls present that day and it's frighteningly easy to dismiss them all as LBBGs (some were very worn). Any thoughts from those familiar (unlike me) with juvenile LBBG and KEGU? I'll post comments anonymously unless you specify that you want to be identified with your comments. -Floyd >Perhaps the more interesting observation I have is of the first winter bird >photographed in March. If this photo is from March it can't be a Lesser >Black-backed Gull. At that time the feathering would have had about 8-9 >months of wearing and bleaching and would not look this fresh and uniform. >The bird pictured is a juvenile based on how fresh and crisp this bird it. >Given that its a juvenile in March, it has to be a southern hemisphere >breeder and therefore a Kelp Gull. In March its typical to see this plumage >stage in Chile/Argentina for example. Please pass on these opinions to >whoever you want. > >Alvaro Jaramillo >chucao(AT)attbi.com _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: A juvenile Larus in March? From: "Dick.newell" <dick.newell(AT)macunlimited.net> Date: 1 May 2002 8:52pm <BR> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><FONT face="Courier New" size=2><FONT face=Arial>Re:</FONT><BR><A class=autolink target=_blank href="http://www.geocities.com/secaribbirds/ttmysterygull">http://www.geocities.com/secaribbirds/ttmysterygull</A><BR><BR>I think the problem here is to decide between graellsii and atlantis. I don't think the bird is a juvenile - many of its scapulars have obvious 2nd generation double anchors. The pattern of these feathers is very unusual for graellsii - they rarely have that much pale cream. Juvenile atlantis is (to my eye) practically indistinguishable from graellsi, and I guess the problem doesn't get much easier with 1st winters.</FONT></DIV> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><FONT face="Courier New"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><FONT face="Courier New">Structurally, I really don't see this bird as a Kelp Gull. It's shape is very like a graellsii and probably atlantis too.</FONT></DIV> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><FONT face="Courier New"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><FONT face="Courier New">Dick</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE><br> <br> ________________________________________________<br> This mail was sent by MacUnlimited Online Mail System<br>
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: A juvenile Larus in March ? From: Peter Adriaens <peter.adriaens(AT)dutchbirding.nl> Date: 2 May 2002 3:47am Hello, while I am quite used to seeing Lesser Black-backed Gulls - a common breeding bird over here -, this one immediately looks somewhat puzzling. Its general impression, with a fresh plumage in March, and broad pale internal markings in the feathers, is not quite what one would expect.I certainly agree that this bird's plumage looks fresh (except for the primaries), but this does not necessarily mean it is a juvenile. To me, at least the lower scapulars do not appear to be juvenile, because of the thin dark anchor pattern, as Dick pointed out. As for the upper scapulars, if they are juvenile feathers, the amount of pale internal markings would be strange (in fact, juvenile scapulars showing an anchor pattern are only regularly seen in very few large gull species, such as Great Black-backed Gull or northern "Argentatus" Herring Gull), and it would be unusual to have only the upper ones retained, while the lower scapulars have been replaced - normally the opposite is true.Looking into detail at the wingcoverts, I notice that, on the right side of the bird, the inner greater coverts look rather uniformly brown and quite worn, indicating that they are retained juvenile feathers. On the left side, however, the inner greater coverts are fresh, and show a distinctly different pattern, such as thin dark barring. This, and the broad pale internal markings (including subterminal markings on the tertials) make me think that this bird has, in fact, replaced a lot of wingcoverts and tertials - which explains why they look fresh.Such an amount of replaced wingcoverts is not typical of Lesser Black-backed Gull in March, though not impossible if the bird spent all winter far south.It is quite OK for Atlantis, but not for Kelp Gull at this time of the year, I think. Best regards, Peter Adriaens Belgium
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Couple of questions From: KACastelein and DJLauten <birdsong(AT)HARBORSIDE.COM> Date: 2 May 2002 7:06am 1) Can anyone comment on whether Willow Flycatchers are ever found in winter in the lower US? Are Willow Flycatchers extremely rare during this season, or are some occasionally found in Nov-Dec-Jan? If so where? Is there any pattern of lingering birds into the early winter in this species? 2) Is it possible to ID dowitchers at all using the bill size and shape? Is this character useful in seperating these species or not? I always thought that there was too much overlap to distinguish between the species and the bill was not a useful character. Anyone use this method to seperate dowitchers in the field? Thanks Dave Lauten Bandon OR birdsong(AT)harborside.com
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: Couple of questions From: John & Liz Walters <lizandjohn(AT)EARTHLINK.NET> Date: 2 May 2002 7:23am Dave Lauten wrote: > Can anyone comment on whether Willow Flycatchers are ever found in > winter in the lower US? Are Willow Flycatchers extremely rare during > this season, or are some occasionally found in Nov-Dec-Jan? If so > where? Is there any pattern of lingering birds into the early winter in > this species? According to Small's "California Birds," Willow Flycatcher has a few winter records along the California coast from San Francisco to Los Angeles. John Walters Bonita, CA lizandjohn(AT)earthlink.net
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: Couple of questions From: Steven Mlodinow <SGMlod(AT)AOL.COM> Date: 2 May 2002 11:08am ----INCLUDING text/plain MIME SECTION---- Greetings All re: Willow Fly in US during winter: Monson and Phillips (1981) list no winter records for AZ. Rosenberg et al. (1991) give no winter records for the lower Colorado Riv Valley Lehman (1994) has a date range from 15 May to 27 Oct for Santa Barbara Co, CA Hamilton and Willick (1996) give a range of 3 May-16 Nov for Orange Co, CA Unitt (1984) gives a range of 2 May-11 Oct for San Diego Co, CA Garrett and Dunn (1981) give one winter record for Southern California: Arcadia, Los Angeles Co., 2 Nov 1979 -29 April 1980 Stevenson and Anderson (1994) and Robertson and Woolfenden (1992) list no winter records for FL. I can't find any TX records in various sources, but I don't have Olberholser, and Lowery (1974) lists on winter winter records for LA. Obviously, here in WA, we have no winter records! Records range from late Apr through late Sep. The scattering of late Apr/early May records from WA during the last decade is most intriguing, given how these dates precede arrival dates from SoCal (though interestingly, Garrett and Dunn state that Willow Fly arrived in CA during late Apr in the past, when the species was more numerous as a breeder there). These early records from WA include singing birds. The bulk off Willow Flys don't arrive in WA until the last few days of May. Cheers Steven Mlodinow Everett WA ----DELETED text/html MIME SECTION----
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: Couple of questions From: Joseph Morlan <jmorlan(AT)CCSF.ORG> Date: 2 May 2002 12:13pm On Thu, 2 May 2002 14:08:10 EDT, Steven Mlodinow <SGMlod(AT)AOL.COM> wrote: >re: Willow Fly in US during winter: In Northern California: Crescent City, Del Norte Co. Nov 1-26, 1981 Freedom, Santa Cruz Co. Jan 1-2, 1986 "Birds of Northern California" McCaskie et al. 1988. -- Joseph Morlan, Pacifica, CA 94044: mailto:jmorlan(AT)ccsf.org California Birding & new rarities: http://fog.ccsf.org/~jmorlan/ California Bird Records Committee: http://www.wfo-cbrc.org/cbrc/
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Handbook to North American Birds From: ian paulsen <ipaulsen(AT)KRL.ORG> Date: 2 May 2002 2:19pm HI ALL: I was recently looking through a copy of:" The Handbook of Bird identification for Europe and the western Palearctic" by Beaman and Madge (1998). I was wondering how come we here in North America (north of Mexico anyway) DON'T have anything like this?? Are we content with the Sibley guide?? sincerely Ian Paulsen Bainbridge Island, WA, USA ipaulsen(AT)krl.org A.K.A.: "Birdbooker" "Rallidae all the way"
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: QRY: Distinctive bill form shown by RN Stint? From: JIm Barton <redwing1986(AT)ATTBI.COM> Date: 2 May 2002 4:15pm This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ----INCLUDING text/plain MIME SECTION---- Hello. The StintFan website = hompage2.nifty.com.stints/calidris/photocalidris.html presents three = photographs of RNST ..calidris ruficollis.. with a bill shape which I = would judge to be unique among stints/peep. This is NOT to say the the = bill of RNST is >generally<< unique in shape; only that the >particular< = form presented under "adult winter" (C) January 28, 1999; "adult = summer" (E) May 10, 1997; and "juvenile" (A) September 13, 1998, is = quite possibly unique. In the form to which I refer, the bill is nearly = of uniform thickness throughout. Importantly, the tip is highly = rounded, giving most of the bill the shape of a test-tube, with parallel = sides and a pronouncedly rounded base. =20 To my eye, the bill does not swell at the tip (e.g., as in = Semi-palmated SP ..C. pusilla.. Your opinions are respectfully solicited. Yours, Jim Barton redwing1986(AT)attbi.com brdbk(AT)aol.com Cambridge, MA Proact...campaigning for birds and their habitats,=20 before it's too late www.proactnow.org ----DELETED text/html MIME SECTION----
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Dowitchers and Willow Flys From: KACastelein and DJLauten <birdsong(AT)HARBORSIDE.COM> Date: 2 May 2002 10:25pm Folks, Concerning dowitchers: Just wanted to comment that I did not mean to suggest that I am attempting to ID dowitchers based on bill length (I don't, there are plenty of other ways). A comment was made recently to this effect, and I was checking to see if the consensus is that iding dowitchers based on bill size is not a practical approach. Concerning Willow Flycatchers: a bird thought to be this species was reported from Coos Bay, Coos Cty, southwestern Oregon on 25 Nov 2001. That struck me as very late to say the least. Seems that lingering Willow Flycatchers are one of the lesser likely Empids to be doing so. The records reported back to me include one from Del Norte Cty N California thru 26 Nov. That's about 2 hours south of Coos Bay on the highway. Thanks for the input, Dave Lauten Bandon OR birdsong(AT)harborside.com
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: flight call CD From: Jeff McCoy <jeffmccoy(AT)fwi.com> Date: 2 May 2002 11:21pm Does anyone know if O'brien and Evan's CD on flight calls has been released, and if so where it is available? -- Jeff McCoy Columbia City, Indiana USA jeffmccoy(AT)fwi.com mobile# (260)615-1911 ____________________________________________________ myVine.com - Unlimited Internet as low as $12.95/mo www.myVine.com
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: A juvenile Larus in March ? From: Martin Reid <upupa(AT)AIRMAIL.NET> Date: 3 May 2002 6:22am Dear all, I want to endorse the comments of Bruce, Dick, and Peter , in that in almost all respects this bird looks good for an LBBG-type (bill proportions, head shape and streaking, very short tail/long primaries). I feel that structurally it is far from a typical Kelp Gull (esp. bill shape, tail length, and while closer to Atlantis YLGU, the very short tail and rather slender bill is a perfect match for LBBG-types and rather atypical of all the YLGU forms. Note that the primaries are extremely faded and worn (they are usually very black, and apparently resistant to such wear/fading in LBBGs) - I feel that this rules out any notion that the bird is a recently-fledged juvenile. The only thing at all odd for 1B LBBG on this bird is its apparent stage of molt: many (but not quite all) of the scaps/mantle feathers seem to be 2nd-gen., and while their pattern is on the pale side for LBBG, I don't think it is out of range; we are not used to seeing 2nd-gen wing-covert feathers on 1B LBBGs, as we expect this tract to be molted in the "summertime" along with other tracts that create the first-summer" appearance. Thanks to the pioneering work of the Muusses, we now know that a few juv LBBGs seems to replace some wing coverts even while still being attended by their parents; a quick look at these mega-early replacement 2nd-gen coverts shows a pattern fairly similar to that of the Caribbean mystery bird. Clearly the mystery bird's coverts feathers look too fresh to have been replaced at the nesting grounds - but assuming there is a physiological reason for this individual to have replaced them in, say Feb, then their pattern looks pretty good for LBBG. Lastly, let's not forget that there is a LBBG-type that regularly replaces many of its 1st-gen wing-coverts in Feb/March: heuglini. I'm saying that the mystery bird is a heuglini - I'm just pointing out that a strategy of Feb-March covert replacement is evident in a LBBG-type that winters in different environment than most graellsii, so it is not much of a stretch to conclude that as graellsii/intermedius invades a similar wintering environment to that of heuglini (Caribbean/NE South America), it will also adopt this molt strategy. Cheers, Martin Martin Reid Fort Worth, Texas upupa(AT)airmail.net http://www.martinreid.com
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: flight call CD From: Tony Leukering <GreatGrayO(AT)AOL.COM> Date: 3 May 2002 7:26am ----INCLUDING text/plain MIME SECTION---- Hi all: The CD is not yet out, but Evans and O'Brien are getting very close. My understanding is that it is at the publisher, so, hopefully, we'll see it in time for counting nocturnal migrants this fall. Later, Tony Leukering Brighton, CO ----DELETED text/html MIME SECTION----
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: A juvenile Larus in March ? From: Nick Rossiter <nrossiter(AT)SUPANET.COM> Date: 3 May 2002 10:12am This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ----INCLUDING text/plain MIME SECTION---- I would be slightly worried if I were the recorder for Trinidad, = building up a collection of LBBG, a number of which are far from = classical. In the first-year bird under debate, the problems of early = moult are resolved if the gull is considered to be atlantis. The bill = might be rather thin for a southern atlantis but northern atlantis can = show such bills. Northern atlantis moult a bit later than southern ones = but are still ahead of LBBG.=20 I thought a second-winter in December shown earlier on the Trinidad site = (recorded 2 December 2001) which was identified as an LBBG, looked much = more like southern atlantis with its chunky bill with steep culmen angle = and prominent gonydal angle. The chest is also bold and, with the usual = caveats about mantle colour in photographs, the mantle shade and colour = (blue-grey) also appear right for atlantis. The pale head with a = pronounced eye patch is also spot-on.=20 The likelihood of atlantis occurring in Trinidad at some time must be = fairly high because the NE trade winds flow straight from the Canaries = to the West Indies.=20 Interestingly some recent DNA studies have differentiated southern = atlantis from northern atlantis, atlantis (particularly the southern = form) from michahellis and indicated that atlantis pre-dates michahellis = (Liebers, Helbig and de Knijff, Molecular Ecology 10 2447-2462, 2001). =20 Cheers ... Nick http://www.nrossiter.supanet.com/ylg/ ----DELETED text/html MIME SECTION----
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Beaman/ Madge book From: ian paulsen <ipaulsen(AT)KRL.ORG> Date: 3 May 2002 10:18am HI ALL: In case anyone is interested in reading a review of the "Handbook of bird identification for Europe and the Western Palearctic" by Beaman/Madge goto Birding Vol 31(5): 475-77 (october 1999). From the lack of responses to my question I guess general birders ARE content with the Sibley guide for identification of North American Birds?? Ian Paulsen Bainbridge Island, WA, USA ipaulsen(AT)krl.org A.K.A.: "Birdbooker" "Rallidae all the way"
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: MY QUESTION From: ian paulsen <ipaulsen(AT)KRL.ORG> Date: 3 May 2002 11:20am HI ALL: To clarify my question: After seeing the Beaman/Madge book recently and buying the Collins European guide I still feel that bird identification guides for North America are still behind what the Europeans are doing. Europe and North America (north of Mexico)_ have similar numbers of birds but they have managed to produce two really good bird guide to cover the avifauna of Europe. Although very good I don't think the current North American guides measure up. Why can't we have a guide up to the European standards?? sincerely Ian Paulsen Bainbridge Island, WA, USA ipaulsen(AT)krl.org A.K.A.: "Birdbooker" "Rallidae all the way"
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: flight call CD From: "John C. Arvin" <JohnCArvin(AT)AOL.COM> Date: 3 May 2002 2:59pm The flight call CD has not been released yet, but is in the production process currently. It should available in a matter of months. jca
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: European & NA Field Guides From: John Saba <sabaj(AT)theriver.com> Date: 3 May 2002 7:11pm Ian Paulsen asks: "Why can't we have a guide up to the European standards??" Why not give us some of the salient differences? In what ways do you think north American guides fail to measure up? --- John Saba sabaj(AT)theriver.com http://personal.riverusers.com/~sabaj/ (520) 327-3643 Tucson, Arizona USA Birding is a Grand Adventure!
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Translation From: Jean-Marc Lustrat <jm_lustrat(AT)HOTMAIL.COM> Date: 4 May 2002 10:13am ----DELETED HTML-ENCODED SECTION----
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: Translation From: Michel Bertrand <bertrmi(AT)COLBA.NET> Date: 4 May 2002 10:56am Jean-Marc Lustrat a écrit : > I search a list of american birds with french names. > Can you help me. ________________________ Jean-Marc, J'ai trois solutions pour toi. Pour les noms français de tous les oiseaux de l'Amérique du Nord dans un guide à jour, voir la version française du guide de la National Geographic Society qui vient tout juste de paraître (*Guide d'identidication des oiseaux de l'Amérique du Nord* 3e édition, 2002, Broquet Éditeur, ISBN 2-89000-551-8). Pour une liste trilingue (français, latin, anglais) des espèces déjà observées au Québec (plus de 500 noms en incluant les exotiques) avec le statut de chacune en prime, voir : http://www.oiseauxqc.org/listann.jsp Pour les noms français de tous les oiseaux du monde : http://membres.lycos.fr/listoiseauxmonde/present.html Salutations amicales... MICHEL BERTRAND Sainte-Julie, Qc bertrmi(AT)colba.net L'acupuncture, c'est la vraie médecine de pointe quand l'acupuncteur n'a pas mauvaise alêne ! -- Moa
[ Prev Week | Next Week | Calendar Month | ID-FRONTIERS Info ]
Send feedback on these pages to: BMail@greatblue.com
B-Mail Message Content Disclaimer
Layout Copyright © 1999-2001 Great Blue Media Works
Last Updated: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:40pm MT

Visit the Birdtop50