The Virtual Birder
The Virtual Birder ®
OnLocation
B-Mail
BIRDxxxx
BIRDCHAT
ID-FRONTIERS
BIRDHAWK
US:NewEngland
US:NewYork
US:MidAtlantic
US:South
US:MidWest
US:West
Canada
Families
Real Birds
Hot Links
Gallery
Media Shelf
Prizes
EdCentral
Rants & Raves
 
 
B-MAIL sm      
 

ID-FRONTIERS for August 21-27, 2005

[ Prev Week | Next Week | Calendar Month | ID-FRONTIERS Info ]

Messages are displayed in the order they were received.
 Subject From Date  Time 
 Probable Solander's Petrel off California  Peter Pyle   Tue, 23 Aug 2005  8:58am 
 Fwd: Solander's screw-up?  sgmlod(AT)AOL.COM  Wed, 24 Aug 2005  6:05pm 
 Re: Probable Solander's Petrel off California  Nate Dias   Wed, 24 Aug 2005  7:41am 
 phalarope leg coloration  Bryan Guarente   Wed, 24 Aug 2005  9:37pm 
 Re: phalarope leg coloration  Hugh McGuinness   Thu, 25 Aug 2005  6:30am 
 Re: phalarope leg coloration  Lethaby, Nick  Thu, 25 Aug 2005  7:50am 
 Re: phalarope leg coloration  Kevin Karlson   Thu, 25 Aug 2005  8:03am 
 Pheucticus ID  GreatGrayOwl(AT)AOL.COM  Thu, 25 Aug 2005  11:49am 
 Re: phalarope leg coloration  OLCOOT1(AT)AOL.COM  Thu, 25 Aug 2005  11:50am 
 Your opinion of this Jaeger...  Matt Orsie   Thu, 25 Aug 2005  7:54pm 
 Re: Your opinion of this Jaeger...Corrected web address  Hugh McGuinness   Thu, 25 Aug 2005  8:03pm 
 North American Birds: latest issue  Ian Paulsen   Thu, 25 Aug 2005  9:06pm 
 Re: Your opinion of this Jaeger...  GreatGrayOwl(AT)AOL.COM  Thu, 25 Aug 2005  9:36pm 
 Juvenile Red Phalarope in TN  OLCOOT1(AT)AOL.COM  Thu, 25 Aug 2005  11:07pm 
 Correct Address to Phalarope site  OLCOOT1(AT)AOL.COM  Thu, 25 Aug 2005  11:12pm 
 Re: Your opinion of this Jaeger...  Martin Reid   Fri, 26 Aug 2005  7:40am 
 Re: Your opinion of this Jaeger...  rsheil   Fri, 26 Aug 2005  2:16pm 
 Unusual Blue Grosbeak  Dave DeReamus   Sat, 27 Aug 2005  11:21pm 
To use email addresses replace '(AT)' with '@'.
This is done to confuse the spam 'bots.


[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Probable Solander's Petrel off California From: Peter Pyle <ppyle(AT)BIRDPOP.ORG> Date: 23 Aug 2005 8:58am Hi all - On 8 August we observed a dark Pterodroma petrel 173 miles west of Cape Mendocino that we've provisionally identified as a Solander's (Providence) Petrel. I was able to obtain about 40 images, the best of which are now posted on Debi Shearwater's site (thanks to Les Lieurance) at http://www.shearwaterjourneys.com/images/SolandersPetrel.html I would be interested in comment/confirmation, especially from those who know this species. In life it appeared larger and lankier than Murphy's Petrel (of which we had 2 in the same vicinity) and flew with much longer arcs. Many plumage features appear to rule out Murphy's Petrel. It was first spotted by Gary Fredrichsen and observed by Thomas Staudt and myself. I chose to attempt obtaining digital images rather than studying it in life, an interesting choice we are now having to make at sea. The bird was observed as part of Southwest Fisheries Science Center's CSCAPE marine mammal and seabird survey, a five-month effort that will cover all waters between the Mexican and Canadian borders and out to 250 or 300 nautical miles from shore. For more information, including trackline and weekly reports, see http://swfsc.nmfs.noaa.gov/PRD/PROJECTS/CSCAPE/default.htm Apologies for the cross-posting. Peter Pyle Join or Leave BIRDWG01: http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=birdwg01 Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Fwd: Solander's screw-up? From: sgmlod(AT)AOL.COM Date: 24 Aug 2005 6:05pm ----INCLUDING text/plain MIME SECTION---- Greetings All I am sending this message to the entire listserv, as Terry Wahl's email to Peter keeps bouncing back to him. Terry, as many of you know, spent many years at sea censusing seabirds and has quite a collection of photos to rely upon. Below is his second attempt to contact PPyle. Cheers Steven Mlodinow Hi, again, and maybe again I don't know if you received my correction re:wrong description of SOPE's tail. I messed up Steve Mlodinow's address for a copy and keep getting messages that the note to you was not sent. Anyway, Solander's does have a wedge-shaped tail, as shown by the photos on the website. Murphy's is often pointed. Along with general, easier-appearing flight style and other field marks Solander's is distinnctive. And I am confident you had a Solander's. You get this ID from an observer with newly-acquired credibility problems, of course. Best, Terry Wahl Join or Leave BIRDWG01: http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=birdwg01 Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html ----DELETED text/html MIME SECTION----
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: Probable Solander's Petrel off California From: Nate Dias <offshorebirder(AT)YAHOO.COM> Date: 24 Aug 2005 7:41am Peter, I think the bird looks good for Solander's Petrel, though I have no experience with Solander's / Providence in the field. Re: the images on the Shearwaterjourneys web page - in some shots (like top left) the bird appears to be pale-headed and in others (particularly bottom right photo) the bird appears to have a darkish hood. But overall, I think the bird looks like it had a darkish hood - was this the case? It's also hard to see the darkish "M" on the upperwings that Solander's Petrel should have, but I think I can see it in a couple of the images. Here is my 2 cents' worth: The larger size, longer wingspan, less uniform coloration and hooded appearance eliminate Murphy's Petrel (P. ultima). The pale flashes at the base of the primaries on the underwing are too bright and well-defined for Great-winged Petrel (Pterodroma macroptera). Some of the photos (esp. of the underside) do not seem to me to eliminate Great-winged Petrel, but other photos seem to show a darker hood, which eliminates P. macroptera. Dark "M" on upperwings (apparent in some images) would also eliminate Great-winged Petrel. The non-brown appearance, lack of white wing flash (white base of primaries) on upperwing and lack of white spots on sides of uppertail eliminate dark morph Kermadec Petrel (P. neglecta). The pale chin strap, grayish (non-brown) coloration, etc. eliminates dark phase Herald Petrel (P. arminjoniana). The lack of pale leading edge of underwing and presence of pale chin strap eliminate Kerguelen Petrel (P. brevirostris). After that, other comparisons seem implausible. Nice find and nice cruise, you lucky dogs. Nate Dias - Charleston, SC (formerly San Francisco, CA) ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs Join or Leave BIRDWG01: http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=birdwg01 Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: phalarope leg coloration From: Bryan Guarente <dafekt1ve(AT)YAHOO.COM> Date: 24 Aug 2005 9:37pm I recently observed a phalarope in east central Illinois that looked good in almost all respects, as far as I could tell, for a red-necked phalarope. The only part of this bird that threw me off was the leg coloration. I saw this bird in flight 4 separate times and each time I was blown away by the fact that the bird had yellow legs, something I had never associated with red-necked phalarope. I have heard of a reference to red-necked phalarope juveniles (maybe fledglings, this was unclear to me) having yellow legs and sometimes retaining this feature into early september. Is this something others have seen? Along the same lines, has anyone seen or heard of drastically different (aberrant) leg colorations in phalaropes into adult plumages (I know charadriiformes are rather variable in most cases, but do not know specifics about this feature in phalaropes)? Any other ideas on this would be great too (hybrid anyone?). I have some VERY POOR quality photos (heat waves, midday light, distant, but still photos) that do not end up showing the yellow leg coloration, only a lighter coloration... i.e. not black legs. I am 99% sure that the leg color was yellow. I apologize here for the poor quality of the photos. I have posted them to a website here: http://www.atmos.uiuc.edu/~bguaren2/phalarope/index.html Any responses you may have to this query would be fantastic either to the list or privately. Thanks in advance for responses. Bryan Guarente University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Atmospheric Sciences Graduate Assistant Champaign, IL ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs Join or Leave BIRDWG01: http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=birdwg01 Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: phalarope leg coloration From: Hugh McGuinness <hmcguinness(AT)ROSS.ORG> Date: 25 Aug 2005 6:30am Bryan, I'm not completely confident in this because I feel I can't see the bird well enough in your photos, but my first impresseion is that the bird is a RED PHALAROPE, not a Red-necked Phalarope. Two points that would support this are the relatively thick eye-patch, and the relatively short, thick, slightly down-curved bill. Red Phalarope would also explain the leg coloration you observed. hugh Hugh McGuinness The Ross School 18 Goodfriend Drive East Hampton, NY 11963 hmcguinness(AT)ross.org 631-907-4229 (no messages please) 631-697-2099 (cell) -----Original Message----- From: NBHC ID-FRONTIERS Frontiers of Field Identification [mailto:BIRDWG01(AT)LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU] On Behalf Of Bryan Guarente Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 12:38 AM To: BIRDWG01(AT)LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU Subject: [BIRDWG01] phalarope leg coloration I recently observed a phalarope in east central Illinois that looked good in almost all respects, as far as I could tell, for a red-necked phalarope. The only part of this bird that threw me off was the leg coloration. I saw this bird in flight 4 separate times and each time I was blown away by the fact that the bird had yellow legs, something I had never associated with red-necked phalarope. I have heard of a reference to red-necked phalarope juveniles (maybe fledglings, this was unclear to me) having yellow legs and sometimes retaining this feature into early september. Is this something others have seen? Along the same lines, has anyone seen or heard of drastically different (aberrant) leg colorations in phalaropes into adult plumages (I know charadriiformes are rather variable in most cases, but do not know specifics about this feature in phalaropes)? Any other ideas on this would be great too (hybrid anyone?). I have some VERY POOR quality photos (heat waves, midday light, distant, but still photos) that do not end up showing the yellow leg coloration, only a lighter coloration... i.e. not black legs. I am 99% sure that the leg color was yellow. I apologize here for the poor quality of the photos. I have posted them to a website here: http://www.atmos.uiuc.edu/~bguaren2/phalarope/index.html Any responses you may have to this query would be fantastic either to the list or privately. Thanks in advance for responses. Bryan Guarente University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Atmospheric Sciences Graduate Assistant Champaign, IL ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs Join or Leave BIRDWG01: http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=birdwg01 Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html Join or Leave BIRDWG01: http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=birdwg01 Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: phalarope leg coloration From: "Lethaby, Nick" <nlethaby(AT)TI.COM> Date: 25 Aug 2005 7:50am A couple of years ago I saw a Red-necked Phalarope with fleshy-yellow legs in Santa Barbara. The bird was feeding on the beach at point-blank range so no doubt about the id. Your photos are a bit too distant for me to determine what it is. The mantle pattern looks typical for a Red-necked but I'm not sure I have ever seen a juvenile Red Phalarope since these seem to moult in first-winter plumage very early. Nick Lethaby DSP/BIOS Product Manager Software Development Systems Texas Instruments 805 562 5106 nlethaby(AT)ti.com -----Original Message----- From: NBHC ID-FRONTIERS Frontiers of Field Identification [mailto:BIRDWG01(AT)LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU] On Behalf Of Bryan Guarente Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 9:38 PM To: BIRDWG01(AT)LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU Subject: [BIRDWG01] phalarope leg coloration I recently observed a phalarope in east central Illinois that looked good in almost all respects, as far as I could tell, for a red-necked phalarope. The only part of this bird that threw me off was the leg coloration. I saw this bird in flight 4 separate times and each time I was blown away by the fact that the bird had yellow legs, something I had never associated with red-necked phalarope. I have heard of a reference to red-necked phalarope juveniles (maybe fledglings, this was unclear to me) having yellow legs and sometimes retaining this feature into early september. Is this something others have seen? Along the same lines, has anyone seen or heard of drastically different (aberrant) leg colorations in phalaropes into adult plumages (I know charadriiformes are rather variable in most cases, but do not know specifics about this feature in phalaropes)? Any other ideas on this would be great too (hybrid anyone?). I have some VERY POOR quality photos (heat waves, midday light, distant, but still photos) that do not end up showing the yellow leg coloration, only a lighter coloration... i.e. not black legs. I am 99% sure that the leg color was yellow. I apologize here for the poor quality of the photos. I have posted them to a website here: http://www.atmos.uiuc.edu/~bguaren2/phalarope/index.html Any responses you may have to this query would be fantastic either to the list or privately. Thanks in advance for responses. Bryan Guarente University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Atmospheric Sciences Graduate Assistant Champaign, IL ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs Join or Leave BIRDWG01: http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=birdwg01 Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html Join or Leave BIRDWG01: http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=birdwg01 Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: phalarope leg coloration From: Kevin Karlson <karlson3(AT)COMCAST.NET> Date: 25 Aug 2005 8:03am reply to phalarope leg coloration and suggestion of Red Phalarope, by Kevin Karlson I am replying both to the question of leg coloration on a juvenile Red-necked Phalarope seen by Bryan Guarente, and the suggestion by another member that this bird might be a Red Phalarope. First the identity: this bird is a juvenile Red-necked Phalarope for the following reasons: 1) the structure of this bird in the first and third photo shows the typical plump, pot bellied look of Red-necked Phalarope, with the first photo showing the small head and very fine-tipped bill. Red Phalarope is noticeably more attenuated (tapered) in the rear end, with longer primaries and undertail coverts, giving the bird a distinctive drawn out appearance, and even in juvenile plumage shows a much heavier bill. 2) photos 2 and 3of this bird show the distinctive gold to buff braces and dark centered feathers on the upperparts, with virtually no molt out of juvenile plumage. Red-necks retain their juvenile plumage well into the fall months, some as late as November. They molt mainly after they reach their wintering areas. Red Phalarope, on the other hand, is virtually never seen in full juvenile plumage away from the breeding grounds. They start their molt in high arctic breeding areas, with rapid replacement of almost all upper back feathers except for median and greater wing coverts, tertials and flight feathers. Even birds seen in August, like one I photographed in Cape May years ago, show a mostly pale gray back with pale feather edges. Paul Lehman, who goes to Gambel every year from mid August until October, says that juvenal Red Phalaropes have already molted a good deal of back feathers by the time he arrives. This bird is clearly in full juvenile plumage, with obvious gold back braces, or edges to mantle feathers and dark colored feathers on the upperparts. While early Red-necked's show these gold braces on the back, birds seen later (Sept onward) appear mostly black, gray and white, having worn the colorful edges off the back feathers while still reataining the distinctive braced appearance with dull whitish edges. Even if a full juvenile Red were to appear in the US prior to molt, they do not show prominent gold braces on the back, but uniform bold gold feather edges to most back feathers. As for the yellow leg color, most juvenile Red and Red-necks show mostly pink legs early in the season, which can vary as to the amount of gray mixed in. While I have never seen yellow legs on juv Red or Red-necked Phalaropes, it is probably just a slight shift in pigment, or lack of pigment. Birds like Red Knot can show gray to green to pink to yellow colored legs, depending upon hormone levels and pigment distribution. Snowy Plovers also run the range from gray to green to pink legs, as do Herring Gulls, which sometimes show yellowish legs instead of the expected pink. This young bird is just showing a slight variation in leg color, and would not warrant any thought of hybrid, since juv Red Phalarope typically shows pinkish to gray legs, and Wilson's does not nest in Arctic breeding areas. Bryan Guarente wrote: >I recently observed a phalarope in east central Illinois that looked >good in almost all respects, as far as I could tell, for a red-necked >phalarope. The only part of this bird that threw me off was the leg >coloration. I saw this bird in flight 4 separate times and each time I >was blown away by the fact that the bird had yellow legs, something I >had never associated with red-necked phalarope. I have heard of a >reference to red-necked phalarope juveniles (maybe fledglings, this was >unclear to me) having yellow legs and sometimes retaining this feature >into early september. Is this something others have seen? Along the >same lines, has anyone seen or heard of drastically different >(aberrant) leg colorations in phalaropes into adult plumages (I know >charadriiformes are rather variable in most cases, but do not know >specifics about this feature in phalaropes)? Any other ideas on this >would be great too (hybrid anyone?). > >I have some VERY POOR quality photos (heat waves, midday light, >distant, but still photos) that do not end up showing the yellow leg >coloration, only a lighter coloration... i.e. not black legs. I am 99% >sure that the leg color was yellow. I apologize here for the poor >quality of the photos. I have posted them to a website here: > >http://www.atmos.uiuc.edu/~bguaren2/phalarope/index.html > >Any responses you may have to this query would be fantastic either to >the list or privately. Thanks in advance for responses. > >Bryan Guarente >University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign >Atmospheric Sciences Graduate Assistant >Champaign, IL > > > >____________________________________________________ >Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page >http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > > >Join or Leave BIRDWG01: http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=birdwg01 > >Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html > > > > Join or Leave BIRDWG01: http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=birdwg01 Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Pheucticus ID From: GreatGrayOwl(AT)AOL.COM Date: 25 Aug 2005 11:49am ----INCLUDING text/plain MIME SECTION---- Hi all: In my experience, some to many non-adult-male Pheucticus grosbeaks cause no small amount of ID uncertainty. The ageing and sexing criteria in Pyle (1997) have not been particularly helpful for the few birds that I've captured over the years here in CO and they also don't do an awful lot with the (apparently) wide range of variation in presumed hybrids I've seen here (which are not at all rare here). With that in mind, I respectfully offer for your perusal three pictures of a bird captured at Barr Lake, CO, on 22 August 2005. They can be viewed at _http://www.schmoker.org/BirdPics/pheucticus/_ (http://www.schmoker.org/BirdPics/pheucticus/) and I'd appreciate hearing from those with opinions as to the ID, age, and sex of the bird pictured -- either privately or to the list as a whole. I will post again after summarizing responses within a reasonable time frame. That post will also present my concerns with this bird in particular and with, particularly, the sexing for immature Black-headed Grosbeaks in early fall presented in Pyle (1997). Thanks to Bill Schmoker for hosting the pix; feel free to peruse his excellent site. Finally, sorry for the cross-posting to those of you that will be receiving this message twice. Thanks, Tony Leukering Brighton, CO Join or Leave BIRDWG01: http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=birdwg01 Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html ----DELETED text/html MIME SECTION----
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: phalarope leg coloration From: OLCOOT1(AT)AOL.COM Date: 25 Aug 2005 11:50am ----INCLUDING text/plain MIME SECTION---- In a message dated 8/25/2005 9:51:29 A.M. Central Standard Time, nlethaby(AT)TI.COM writes: I'm not sure I have ever seen a juvenile Red Phalarope since these seem to moult in first-winter plumage very early. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In a message dated 8/25/2005 10:04:02 A.M. Central Standard Time, karlson3(AT)COMCAST.NET writes: Red Phalarope, on the other hand, is virtually never seen in full juvenile plumage away from the breeding grounds. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was fortunate enough to find and photograph a juvenile plumaged Red Phalarope that had only molted a few (4) mantle feathers on each side, here at Memphis, TN on August 19, 2000. I too expected never to see one in this plumage down here but heck Steve McConnell and I had an adult in breeding plumage flying around at Little Creek one year and I never thought I'd see that outside of going to Churchill, so anything is possible with Wind Birds. Here along the Mississippi River, we get quite a few Wilson's Phalarope (high count in spring in the hundreds) and Red-necked yearly, even had a breeding plumaged Red-necked in spring a couple of years ago. Red are by far the rarest but I've had all 3 species in view in TN at one time in September and on the same day at two locations once before that. I'll put together a few photos and let you all know when and where, hopefully tonight. Now back to work......... Good Birding!!! Jeff R. Wilson OL'COOT / TLBA Bartlett, TN Join or Leave BIRDWG01: http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=birdwg01 Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html ----DELETED text/html MIME SECTION----
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Your opinion of this Jaeger... From: Matt Orsie <vireo(AT)ADELPHIA.NET> Date: 25 Aug 2005 7:54pm This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ----INCLUDING text/plain MIME SECTION---- Hi All, I'm an avid birder from West Virginia and a couple a days ago I = found the first Jaeger to show up in the state in 32 years. Needless to saw we = don't get many seabirds here in land locked WV. This sub-adult or adult Jaeger seems to exhibit characteristics of PAJA = and LTJA. I'd be interested in what you think. I've posted 7 images at http://wvbirder/mto9 that you can look it. Thanks and Good Birding, Matt Orsie Summit Point, WV Jefferson County web site: http://wvbirder.com Join or Leave BIRDWG01: http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=3Dbirdwg01 Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html ----DELETED text/html MIME SECTION----
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: Your opinion of this Jaeger...Corrected web address From: Hugh McGuinness <hmcguinness(AT)ROSS.ORG> Date: 25 Aug 2005 8:03pm The posted address for viewing the Jaeger photos doesn't seem to work, but the following does: http://wvbirder.com/mto9/ Interesting bird. hugh Hugh McGuinness Sag Harbor, NY ________________________________ From: NBHC ID-FRONTIERS Frontiers of Field Identification on behalf of Matt Orsie Sent: Thu 8/25/2005 10:44 PM To: BIRDWG01(AT)LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU Subject: [BIRDWG01] Your opinion of this Jaeger... Hi All, I'm an avid birder from West Virginia and a couple a days ago I found the first Jaeger to show up in the state in 32 years. Needless to saw we don't get many seabirds here in land locked WV. This sub-adult or adult Jaeger seems to exhibit characteristics of PAJA and LTJA. I'd be interested in what you think. I've posted 7 images at http://wvbirder/mto9 that you can look it. Thanks and Good Birding, Matt Orsie Summit Point, WV Jefferson County web site: http://wvbirder.com Join or Leave BIRDWG01: http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=birdwg01 Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html Join or Leave BIRDWG01: http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=birdwg01 Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: North American Birds: latest issue From: Ian Paulsen <birdbooker(AT)ZIPCON.NET> Date: 25 Aug 2005 9:06pm HI: The latest issue of North American Birds has many articles of interest: 1) Three articles on the Ivory-billed Woodpecker (including new artwork by David Sibley comparing it to the Pileated Woodpecker). 2) two sapsucker articles. 3) two photo salons: northern owl invasion and Mexico comes to Texas. plus the usual columns! -- Ian Paulsen Bainbridge Island, WA, USA A.K.A.: "Birdbooker" "Rallidae all the way!" Join or Leave BIRDWG01: http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=birdwg01 Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: Your opinion of this Jaeger... From: GreatGrayOwl(AT)AOL.COM Date: 25 Aug 2005 9:36pm ----INCLUDING text/plain MIME SECTION---- Hi all: I don't see any real reason to debate the identity of the WV jaeger -- it is an adult-like Long-tailed. The overall gray tone of the back contrasting strongly with the darker flight feathers; the extensive gray on the belly extending up nearly to the chest; the very long central rects; the bill shape; and the head pattern all point to Long-tailed and away from the other jaegers. Additionally, one can even discern in pj6 that only the outer two primaries have whitish shafts. Though very soft, the date is also quite suggestive of Long-tailed. Finally, the bird is standing on dirt in many pictures -- another strong argument for Long-tailed! :-) Excellent record! Tony Leukering Brighton, CO In a message dated 8/25/2005 8:55:08 PM Mountain Standard Time, vireo(AT)ADELPHIA.NET writes: Hi All, I'm an avid birder from West Virginia and a couple a days ago I found the first Jaeger to show up in the state in 32 years. Needless to saw we don't get many seabirds here in land locked WV. This sub-adult or adult Jaeger seems to exhibit characteristics of PAJA and LTJA. I'd be interested in what you think. I've posted 7 images at _http://wvbirder/mto9_ (http://wvbirder/mto9) that you can look it. Thanks and Good Birding, Matt Orsie Summit Point, WV Jefferson County web site: _http://wvbirder.com_ (http://wvbirder.com/) Join or Leave BIRDWG01: http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=birdwg01 Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html Join or Leave BIRDWG01: http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=birdwg01 Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html ----DELETED text/html MIME SECTION----
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Juvenile Red Phalarope in TN From: OLCOOT1(AT)AOL.COM Date: 25 Aug 2005 11:07pm ----INCLUDING text/plain MIME SECTION---- It was brought up in the discussion of the east central Illinois Red-necked Phalarope that Red Phalaropes are seldom seen off the breeding grounds in juvenile plumage. I've posted a bunch of shots of TN phalaropes on a web page including a Juvenile plumaged Red that showed up in Memphis on August 19, a few years back. If interested try: _http://www.pbase.com/ol_coot/gallery/phalarope_ (http://www.pbase.com/ol_coot/gallery/phalarope) Good Birding!!! Jeff R. Wilson OL'COOT / TLBA Bartlett, TN Join or Leave BIRDWG01: http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=birdwg01 Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html ----DELETED text/html MIME SECTION----
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Correct Address to Phalarope site From: OLCOOT1(AT)AOL.COM Date: 25 Aug 2005 11:12pm ----INCLUDING text/plain MIME SECTION---- Sorry, they gave me the wrong address. This will take you to the album; _http://www.pbase.com/ol_coot/phalaropes_ (http://www.pbase.com/ol_coot/phalaropes) Good Birding!!! Jeff R. Wilson OL'COOT / TLBA Bartlett, TN Join or Leave BIRDWG01: http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=birdwg01 Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html ----DELETED text/html MIME SECTION----
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: Your opinion of this Jaeger... From: Martin Reid <upupa(AT)AIRMAIL.NET> Date: 26 Aug 2005 7:40am Dear all, I just want to echo Tony Leukering's excellent comments about this LTJA - I wish it would come down to Texas.... Cheers, Martin -- Martin Reid San Antonio, Texas mailto:upupa(AT)airmail.net http://www.martinreid.com Join or Leave BIRDWG01: http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=birdwg01 Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: Your opinion of this Jaeger... From: rsheil <rsheil(AT)JUNO.COM> Date: 26 Aug 2005 2:16pm I will go with this LTJA being younger than an adult, probably third-summer, possibly second-summer, based on the presence of some barring on the underwing coverts, a few barred feathers on the uppertail coverts, duskily spotted and streaked ear coverts, and the remnants of a gray chest band. Regards, Richard Heil S. Peabody, MA rsheil(AT)juno.com ----- Original Message ----- From: <GreatGrayOwl(AT)AOL.COM> To: <BIRDWG01(AT)LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 12:36 AM Subject: Re: [BIRDWG01] Your opinion of this Jaeger... > > Hi all: > > I don't see any real reason to debate the identity of the WV jaeger -- it is > an adult-like Long-tailed. The overall gray tone of the back contrasting > strongly with the darker flight feathers; the extensive gray on the belly > extending up nearly to the chest; the very long central rects; the bill shape; and > the head pattern all point to Long-tailed and away from the other jaegers. > Additionally, one can even discern in pj6 that only the outer two primaries > have whitish shafts. > > Though very soft, the date is also quite suggestive of Long-tailed. > Finally, the bird is standing on dirt in many pictures -- another strong argument > for Long-tailed! :-) > > Excellent record! > > Tony Leukering > Brighton, CO > > > In a message dated 8/25/2005 8:55:08 PM Mountain Standard Time, > vireo(AT)ADELPHIA.NET writes: > > Hi All, > I'm an avid birder from West Virginia and a couple a days ago I found > the first Jaeger to show up in the state in 32 years. Needless to saw we > don't get many > seabirds here in land locked WV. > > This sub-adult or adult Jaeger seems to exhibit characteristics of PAJA and > LTJA. > I'd be interested in what you think. > > I've posted 7 images at _http://wvbirder/mto9_ (http://wvbirder/mto9) > that you can look it. > > > Thanks and Good Birding, > Matt Orsie > Summit Point, WV > Jefferson County > web site: _http://wvbirder.com_ (http://wvbirder.com/) > Join or Leave BIRDWG01: > http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=birdwg01 > Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html > > > > > > Join or Leave BIRDWG01: http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=birdwg01 > > Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html > > Join or Leave BIRDWG01: http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=birdwg01 Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Unusual Blue Grosbeak From: Dave DeReamus <becard(AT)FAST.NET> Date: 27 Aug 2005 11:21pm Hi all, A Blue Grosbeak with an unusual plumage was photographed in eastern PA during this past breeding season. The bird was seen feeding young in the company of a singing adult male. I would appreciate any comments or opinions as to whether this bird is an abnormally bluish female or a very dull first-year male. The observed behavior mentioned above (the bird feeding young) points to the bird being a female. Has anyone out there ever seen a first-year male feed young in the company of an adult male? Four photos of the bird can be viewed at the following link: http://www.users.fast.net/~becard/index8.html Thanks and Good Birding, Dave DeReamus Compiler of the 'Eastern PA Birdline' Easton, PA becard(AT)fast.net My 'Eastern PA Birding' Website: http://www.users.fast.net/~becard/index.html Join or Leave BIRDWG01: http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=birdwg01 Archives: http://listserv.arizona.edu/archives/birdwg01.html

[ Prev Week | Next Week | Calendar Month | ID-FRONTIERS Info ]
Send feedback on these pages to: BMail@greatblue.com
B-Mail Message Content Disclaimer
Layout Copyright © 1999-2001 Great Blue Media Works
Last Updated: Friday, November 2, 2007 11:40am MT