The Virtual Birder
The Virtual Birder ®
The Store
OnLocation
B-Mail
BIRDxxxx
US:NewEngland
US:NewYork
US:MidAtlantic
US:South
ARBIRD-L
CarolinaBirds
GABO-L
LABIRD-L
MISSBIRD
US:MidWest
US:West
Canada
Families
Real Birds
Hot Links
Gallery
Media Shelf
Prizes
EdCentral
Rants & Raves
 
 
B-MAIL sm      
 

LABIRD-L for Tuesday, February 13, 2001

[ Prev Day | Next Day | Calendar Month | LABIRD-L Info ]

Messages are displayed in the order they were received.
 Subject From Time 
 FW: Shorebird numbers in North America  JINGOLD   7:31am 
 Mark Swan's Bullock Oriole  David J. L'Hoste  9:37am 
 Re: Backyard Bird Count and the Sunday Advocate  Van Remsen   10:18am 
 Fwd: Bush's 1st Big Hit - HELP!  James Beck   1:50pm 
 Re: Shorebird numbers in North America  Paul Dickson   1:58pm 
 Re: Bush's 1st Big Hit - HELP!  Paul Dickson   4:00pm 
 Re: Bush's 1st Big Hit - HELP!  James Beck   4:20pm 
 Re: Bush's, Thanks Paul  Pat and Hubert Herve  5:50pm 
 Re: Mark Swan's Bullock Oriole  Bill Wood   7:07pm 
 Bird Sightings - Time To Lighten UP??  Jay V. Huner  9:38pm 
 White-tailed Hawk IMMATURE at Welch dump  Mark Swan   10:45pm 
To use email addresses replace '(AT)' with '@'.
This is done to confuse the spam 'bots.


[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: FW: Shorebird numbers in North America From: JINGOLD <JINGOLD(AT)PILOT.LSUS.EDU> Date: 13 Feb 2001 7:31am I'm forwardingthis from Oklahoma birds. Jim Ingold jingold(AT)pilot.lsus.edu ******************************************* The Canadian Wildlife Service has just released its "Estimates of shorebird populations in North America" (Occasional Paper Number 104) authored by R.I.G. (Guy) Morrison (2001) and five other Canadian and American ornithologists. Remember that these numbers are best estimates. NA = North America. 1. Black-bellied Plover: Global 498,000 with 200,000 in NA. 2. American Golden-Plover: 150,000+ 3. Pacific Golden-Plover: Global population 125,000 with 16,000 in NA. 4. Snowy Plover: Global 586,000 with 16,000 in NA. 5. Wilson's Plover: 6000+ 6. Common Ringed Plover: Global 442,500 with less than 10,000? in NA. 7. Semipalmated Plover: 150,000 8. Piping Plover: 5913 with 2110 in Canada. 9. Killdeer: 1,000,000+ with Canadian population estimate of 366,000. Size of Neotropical population is unknown. 10. Mountain Plover: 9000 with 10 in Canada. 11. American Oystercatcher: Global 58,850 with 8850 in NA and 4 in Canada. 12. Black Oystercatcher: 8900 13. Black-necked Stilt: Global 850,000+ with 150,000 in NA and 400 in Canada. 14. American Avocet: 450,000 with 63,000 in Canada. 15. Greater Yellowlegs: 100,000 16. Lesser Yellowlegs: 500,000 17. Solitary Sandpiper: 25,000 18. Willet: 250,000 with 25,000 in Canada. Eastern nominate subspecies (semipalmatus) estimated at 90,000 and western interior subspecies (inornatus) at 160,000. 19. Wandering Tattler: 10,000 with 5,000 in Canada. 20. Spotted Sandpiper: 150,000 21. Upland Sandpiper: 350,000 with 10,000 in Canada. 22. Eskimo Curlew: Less than 50 if the species still survives. "Note: In my opinion, the Eskimo Curlew has been extinct for many years. Last specimen taken in Canada on 29 August 1932 in Labrador. Last photographed (one) in March and April 1962 near Galveston, Texas. Last specimen shot on 4 September 1963 in Barbados, West Indes. No 100% reliable sightings since the 1960s. Recent reports probably are juvenile Whimbrels with short bills or vagrant Little Curlews." 23. Whimbrel: Global 797,000+ with 57,000 in NA. 24. Bristle-thighed Curlew: 10,000. This species breeds in Alaska and winters in Oceania. 25. Long-billed Curlew: 20,000. The Canadian breeding population is probably several thousand birds. 26. Hudsonian Godwit: 50,000 with about 10,000 migrating through James Bay. 27. Bar-tailed Godwit: Golbal 1,345,000 with 100,000 in NA. 28. Marbled Godwit: 171,500. The Canadian breeding population is about 103,000 with the small James Bay population estimated at 1000 to 2000 birds. 29. Ruddy Turnstone: Global 449,000 with 235,000 in NA. 30. Black Turnstone: 80,000 31. Surfbird: 70,000 32. Red Knot: Global 1,29,000 with 400,000 in NA. 33. Sanderling: Global 643,000 with 300,000 in NA. 34. Semipalmated Sandpiper: 3,500,000 35. Western Sandpiper: 3,500,000 36. Least Sandpiper: 600,000 37. White-rumped Sandpiper: 400,000 38. Baird's Sandpiper: 300,000 39. Pectoral Sandpiper: 400,000 40. Sharp-tailed Sandpiper: Global 166,000 with about 1000 using the NA Pacific coast south of Alaska. 41. Purple Sandpiper: Global 65,000 with 15,000 in Canada. 42. Rock Sandpiper: Global 200,000 with 150,000 in NA including 1000+ wintering in British Columbia. 43. Dunlin: Global 3,934,000 with 1,525,000 in NA. 44. Stilt Sandpiper: 200,000 45. Buff-breasted Sandpiper: 15,000 46. Short-billed Dowitcher: 320,000. Three well-marked subspecies with estimates of 110,000 for eastern nominate griseus, interior hendersoni about 60,000, and western caurinus about 150,000. 47. Long-billed Dowitcher: 500,000 48. Common Snipe: Global 26,750,000 with 2,000,000 in NA. 49. American Woodcock: 5,000,000 with 1,000,000 in Canada. 50. Wilson's Phalarope: 1,500,000 with 680,000 in Canada. 51. Red-necked Phalarope: Global 4,000,000 with 2,500,000 in NA. 52. Red Phalarope: 1,000,000 Four Additional Species: 1. Gray-tailed Tattler: Confirmed breeding record for Alaska. 2. Red-necked Stint: A few dozen breed in Alaska. 3. Curlew Sandpiper: A few dozen breed in Alaska. 4. Ruff: A few dozen breed in Alaska. This 64 page report (Occasional Paper Number 104) is available from: Publications Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 (819) 997-1095 (819) 997-2756 (fax) cws-scf(AT)ec.gc.ca http://www.cws-scf.ec.gc.ca
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Mark Swan's Bullock Oriole From: "David J. L'Hoste" <lhoste(AT)LHOSTELAW.COM> Date: 13 Feb 2001 9:37am Mark Swan's Bullock Oriole is now online and accessible from the LOS homepage: http://losbird.org Sorry for the delay in posting his photos to the website, but I was off birding this weekend. Let's see...Mountain Plover, Gray Flycatcher, Hutton's Vireo, Red Crossbill, Cassin's Finch, Townsend's Solitaire, Golden Eagle, Priairie Falcon, Costa's Hummingbird, etc. Oh yeah, and Eurasian Collared-Dove. Regards, David -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- David J. L'Hoste L'Hoste & Ramsey, L.L.C. Attorney at Law 400 Lafayette Street, Suite 150 504.566.0056 Telephone New Orleans, Louisiana 70130 504.450.0071 Cellular mailto:lhoste(AT)lhostelaw.com 504.525.7213 Facsimile http://lhostelaw.com/ia/ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: Backyard Bird Count and the Sunday Advocate From: Van Remsen <najames(AT)unix1.sncc.lsu.edu> Date: 13 Feb 2001 10:18am On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Jay V. Huner wrote: > It is frustrating to me to see the response of people to a genuine > effort by a "hooks and bullets" person to encourage bird watching. > Yes, there are "errors" in the Macaluso article. You can be highly > critical of the author OR you can praise the author for the effort and > assist the author with constructive criticism. > I am saddened by the mean-spirited response of some of you. Jay/LABIRD -- I think everyone was careful not to slam Macaluso by name -- he may indeed have nothing to do with the misidentifications. However, he is credited as author of the piece and therefore has to accept responsibility. Being ignorant of facts obvious to casual backyard birders is excusable, but if you're going to write a newspaper article on the topic, then failing to seek any help to remedy the ignorance is not, especially when a reporter's first responsibility is to get the facts straight. And my point was ... when a reporter fails to even attempt to get the facts straight, as in this case, the publicity actually does as much harm as it does good -- how many birdwatchers would be reluctant to participate in a project in which Bachman's Warbler etc. are promoted as expected species? What if an article appeared on aquaculture in which it was clear that the reporter had botched the facts so badly, facts that could have been checked with a single phone call, that it made you aquaculture people look bad? Somehow, Jay, I doubt that you'd be calling up the reporter to praise them for the effort. ################################# Van Remsen, LSU Museum of Natural Science, najames(AT)unix1.sncc.lsu.edu
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Fwd: Bush's 1st Big Hit - HELP! From: James Beck <buteo(AT)WORLDNET.ATT.NET> Date: 13 Feb 2001 1:50pm All, FYI from NEOORN. Please visit the site below for information and to sign the petition against drilling in Alaska. James >Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 05:05:04 -0500 >Reply-To: Bulletin Board for Ornithologists working with Neotropical >Birds <NEOORN-L(AT)listserv.lsu.edu> >Sender: Bulletin Board for Ornithologists working with Neotropical >Birds <NEOORN-L(AT)listserv.lsu.edu> >From: "Sebastian K. Herzog" <skherzog(AT)COMPUSERVE.COM> >Subject: Bush's 1st Big Hit - HELP! >To: NEOORN-L(AT)listserv.lsu.edu > >NEOORN: >sorry for possible cross-postings and that this does not have much to do >with neotropical >birds......but I think you will agree that it is of sad interest. > >Sebastian Herzog > >-------------Weitergeleitete Nachricht----------------- > >Von: "Patricia B. Caffrey", INTERNET:pcaffrey(AT)wwfbolivia.org >An: > "Sebastian Herzog", skherzog > >Datum: 12.02.101 15:59 > >BE: Bush's 1st Big Hit - HELP! > > > >Dear Friends, > >Please consider signing the petition to "Save the Artic Refuge". The >petition can be accessed as described below - enter the following website: >http://www.savearcticrefuge.org. > >This is a real threat! > >Best regards, > >Trish > >{ SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1}We're today launching a petition drive in support of >protecting the Arctic Refuge. > > This is our first use of the Internet technique of using what's called a >"flash" video > > cartoon in support of our cause. I thought you might enjoy seeing it. Ed >Asner was > > kind enough to narrate the cartoon. Besides putting pressure on the >Congress and > > White House, of course, another purpose is to build our list of email >names for the > > many battles ahead. That's why the it is a "viral" petition ... we want >folks to sign the > > petition and then send it on to their friends ... i.e. start what amounts >to a chain letter. > > We'll see how it works. > > > > A word of warning. If you have an older and therefore slower computer, >you may > > not be able to see the cartoon. Or, it may be only partially visible, and >Ed's voice > > indistinguishable. Let me know what you think. Best wishes -- Rodger > > > > ---------------------- > > **URGENT**: JOIN The Internet Campaign to Save the Arctic National >Wildlife > > Refuge from Big Oil! > > > > If you only help one environmental cause this year, please make it this >one! Be sure > > to forward the petition to your friends! > > > > Help us stop the big international oil companies from drilling in the >heart of America's > > most magnificent wildlife sanctuary, the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge >in Alaska. > > Often called "America's Serengeti", the Refuge is home to caribou, musk >oxen, polar > > bears, wolves, arctic foxes, millions of migratory birds and hundreds of >other animals. > > Oil drilling, construction activity and oil spills would inflict terrible >damage on the > > fragile arctic ecosystem and kill wildlife. The Refuge is also America's >most important > > onshore polar bear nursery ground. Polar bears would likely be driven from >their > > dens by the onslaught of aircraft, ships, trucks, road and pipeline >construction, and > > drilling -- possibly leaving their cubs to die. Oil development risks >another massive oil > > spill like the Exxon Valdez disaster. It simply isn't worth six months' >oil that wouldn't > > reach market for 10 years or more. > > > > To stop Big Oil, we need your help to demand that President Bush and >Congress > > NOT allow drilling in the Arctic Refuge. If we're to save the Refuge, we >need to > > make this the biggest Internet environmental petition ever. We need >millions of > > people to call for the Refuge to be protected from the devastation caused >by oil > > drilling. Insist that President Bush and Congress NOT allow drilling in >this unique > > Arctic wilderness -- one of the few truly wild places left. We should no >more allow > > drilling here than in Yellowstone Park or the Grand Canyon. > > > > We've created a special animated video at the cutting edge of Internet >technology, to > > assist the campaign to save the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. > > > > { HYPERLINK "http://www.defenders.org/arcticvideo;" }To view the video >and take action, click here: > > { HYPERLINK >"http://www.savearcticrefuge.org/video" }http://www.savearcticrefuge.org/vid >eo > > > > -or- > > > > To take action without viewing the video, click here: > > { HYPERLINK >"http://www.savearcticrefuge.org" }http://www.savearcticrefuge.org > > > > Whichever you do, please forward the message to friends and family who >share your > > desire to protect the environment. With millions of petitions, our >collective voice will > > be heard by decision-makers in Washington. > > > > > > >----------------------- Internet Header -------------------------------- >Sender: pcaffrey(AT)wwfbolivia.org >Received: from scbbs-bo.com (ns.scbbs.com.bo [166.114.154.21]) > by spdmgaaf.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-1.9) with ESMTP id > JAA02761 > for <skherzog(AT)compuserve.com>; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:59:31 -0500 (EST) >Received: from ns.scbbs-bo.com [166.114.154.21] by scbbs-bo.com > (SMTPD32-6.05) id A98DBDB200DA; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:57:16 -0400 >Received: FROM wwf BY ns.scbbs-bo.com ; Mon Feb 12 10:57:10 2001 -0400 >From: "Patricia B. Caffrey" <pcaffrey(AT)wwfbolivia.org> >To: "Stone-Jimenez Mary Anne" <mstone(AT)smtp.aed.org>, > "Specht Chelsea" <chelsea(AT)amnh.org>, > "Soltani Atossa" <asoltani(AT)igc.apc.org>, "Sohn John" <jsohn(AT)foe.org>, > "Smith Sara" <lwsara(AT)aol.com>, "Shelburne Family" > <DShelburne(AT)aol.com>, > "Seto Thelma" <tgseto(AT)hotmail.com>, > "Sebastian Herzog" <skherzog(AT)compuserve.com>, > "SBDA" <sbda(AT)mail.infonet.com.bo>, > "Samuels Lauren" <andrew.noss(AT)scbbs-bo.com>, > "Rob Glastra" <rglas(AT)hetnet.nl>, > "Quintela Carlos" <cequintela(AT)ecoq.com>, > "Quintela Blanca" <bquintela(AT)pluspetrol.com.ar>, > "PROMETA" <prometa(AT)olivo.tja.entelnet.bo>, > "PROCESO" <proceso-edu(AT)scbbs-bo.com>, > "Price Steve" <sprice(AT)wwfcanada.org>, > "Powell George" <gvnpowell(AT)hotmail.com>, > "Postero Nancy" <npostero(AT)igc.org>, > "Pinard Michelle" <m.a.pinard(AT)abdn.ac.uk>, > "Pendzich Christine" <CPendzich(AT)aol.com>, > "Paul Coopmans" <coopmans(AT)ecnet.ec>, > "Olson David" <David.Olson(AT)WWFUS.ORG>, > "Oviedo Gonzalo" <goviedo(AT)wwfnet.org> >Subject: Bush's 1st Big Hit - HELP! >Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:04:45 -0400 >Message-ID: <NEBBJGIEALMMMMMFMFKPKEHCCJAA.pcaffrey(AT)wwfbolivia.org> >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >X-Priority: 3 (Normal) >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 >Importance: Normal ________________________________________________________________ James Beck Metairie, LA buteo(AT)worldnet.att.net
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: Shorebird numbers in North America From: Paul Dickson <Paul(AT)MORRISDICKSON.COM> Date: 13 Feb 2001 1:58pm Labird: I think that these numbers are all too low. I counted 10,000 white-rumped sandpipers in one day on May 5 a few years ago. I find it hard to believe that I was seeing 3 percent of the continental population on that one day. If these numbers are close to reality, then we who live and bird in Louisiana should be all the more thankful of living in this bottleneck of North American migration. Only 100,000 greater yellowlegs? If so we must have them all. The Red River has been high all winter and is showing lots of new sand in pool #5 so shorebirding should be great up here this Spring. Also, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is paying Louisiana landowners, mostly rice farmers, to flood shallow, open wetlands in the period August 1-September 15 for use by migrant birds, mostly shorebirds. These payments will come out of the "wildlife habitat improvement program" (WHIP) and should produce some good fall shorebird watching this year. Paul Dickson -----Original Message----- From: JINGOLD [mailto:JINGOLD(AT)PILOT.LSUS.EDU] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 7:31 AM To: LABIRD-L(AT)listserv.lsu.edu Subject: FW: Shorebird numbers in North America I'm forwardingthis from Oklahoma birds. Jim Ingold jingold(AT)pilot.lsus.edu ******************************************* The Canadian Wildlife Service has just released its "Estimates of shorebird populations in North America" (Occasional Paper Number 104) authored by R.I.G. (Guy) Morrison (2001) and five other Canadian and American ornithologists. Remember that these numbers are best estimates. NA = North America. 1. Black-bellied Plover: Global 498,000 with 200,000 in NA. 2. American Golden-Plover: 150,000+ 3. Pacific Golden-Plover: Global population 125,000 with 16,000 in NA. 4. Snowy Plover: Global 586,000 with 16,000 in NA. 5. Wilson's Plover: 6000+ 6. Common Ringed Plover: Global 442,500 with less than 10,000? in NA. 7. Semipalmated Plover: 150,000 8. Piping Plover: 5913 with 2110 in Canada. 9. Killdeer: 1,000,000+ with Canadian population estimate of 366,000. Size of Neotropical population is unknown. 10. Mountain Plover: 9000 with 10 in Canada. 11. American Oystercatcher: Global 58,850 with 8850 in NA and 4 in Canada. 12. Black Oystercatcher: 8900 13. Black-necked Stilt: Global 850,000+ with 150,000 in NA and 400 in Canada. 14. American Avocet: 450,000 with 63,000 in Canada. 15. Greater Yellowlegs: 100,000 16. Lesser Yellowlegs: 500,000 17. Solitary Sandpiper: 25,000 18. Willet: 250,000 with 25,000 in Canada. Eastern nominate subspecies (semipalmatus) estimated at 90,000 and western interior subspecies (inornatus) at 160,000. 19. Wandering Tattler: 10,000 with 5,000 in Canada. 20. Spotted Sandpiper: 150,000 21. Upland Sandpiper: 350,000 with 10,000 in Canada. 22. Eskimo Curlew: Less than 50 if the species still survives. "Note: In my opinion, the Eskimo Curlew has been extinct for many years. Last specimen taken in Canada on 29 August 1932 in Labrador. Last photographed (one) in March and April 1962 near Galveston, Texas. Last specimen shot on 4 September 1963 in Barbados, West Indes. No 100% reliable sightings since the 1960s. Recent reports probably are juvenile Whimbrels with short bills or vagrant Little Curlews." 23. Whimbrel: Global 797,000+ with 57,000 in NA. 24. Bristle-thighed Curlew: 10,000. This species breeds in Alaska and winters in Oceania. 25. Long-billed Curlew: 20,000. The Canadian breeding population is probably several thousand birds. 26. Hudsonian Godwit: 50,000 with about 10,000 migrating through James Bay. 27. Bar-tailed Godwit: Golbal 1,345,000 with 100,000 in NA. 28. Marbled Godwit: 171,500. The Canadian breeding population is about 103,000 with the small James Bay population estimated at 1000 to 2000 birds. 29. Ruddy Turnstone: Global 449,000 with 235,000 in NA. 30. Black Turnstone: 80,000 31. Surfbird: 70,000 32. Red Knot: Global 1,29,000 with 400,000 in NA. 33. Sanderling: Global 643,000 with 300,000 in NA. 34. Semipalmated Sandpiper: 3,500,000 35. Western Sandpiper: 3,500,000 36. Least Sandpiper: 600,000 37. White-rumped Sandpiper: 400,000 38. Baird's Sandpiper: 300,000 39. Pectoral Sandpiper: 400,000 40. Sharp-tailed Sandpiper: Global 166,000 with about 1000 using the NA Pacific coast south of Alaska. 41. Purple Sandpiper: Global 65,000 with 15,000 in Canada. 42. Rock Sandpiper: Global 200,000 with 150,000 in NA including 1000+ wintering in British Columbia. 43. Dunlin: Global 3,934,000 with 1,525,000 in NA. 44. Stilt Sandpiper: 200,000 45. Buff-breasted Sandpiper: 15,000 46. Short-billed Dowitcher: 320,000. Three well-marked subspecies with estimates of 110,000 for eastern nominate griseus, interior hendersoni about 60,000, and western caurinus about 150,000. 47. Long-billed Dowitcher: 500,000 48. Common Snipe: Global 26,750,000 with 2,000,000 in NA. 49. American Woodcock: 5,000,000 with 1,000,000 in Canada. 50. Wilson's Phalarope: 1,500,000 with 680,000 in Canada. 51. Red-necked Phalarope: Global 4,000,000 with 2,500,000 in NA. 52. Red Phalarope: 1,000,000 Four Additional Species: 1. Gray-tailed Tattler: Confirmed breeding record for Alaska. 2. Red-necked Stint: A few dozen breed in Alaska. 3. Curlew Sandpiper: A few dozen breed in Alaska. 4. Ruff: A few dozen breed in Alaska. This 64 page report (Occasional Paper Number 104) is available from: Publications Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 (819) 997-1095 (819) 997-2756 (fax) cws-scf(AT)ec.gc.ca http://www.cws-scf.ec.gc.ca
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: Bush's 1st Big Hit - HELP! From: Paul Dickson <Paul(AT)MORRISDICKSON.COM> Date: 13 Feb 2001 4:00pm Labird: While respecting your concern and sincerity James, I must offer a differing view on this issue and the "Ed Asner" approach to conservation. The 1970's saw the confrontational style of the anti-war movement carry over to environmental issues. "SAVE THE...." was certain to bring in dollars to whatever group used it because we all wanted to save things and felt good about contributing money and letters to saving natural things. And face it, people love to fight things that have been demonized. That confrontational approach saved very little in its day. Whales have perhaps benefited some but still face serious threats at sea apart from commercial taking. The Bald eagle, the Peregrine, and many other birds owe their whole being now to the outlawing of DDT. A few articulate scientists did that with little public input. The Peregrine was reintroduced as was the Wild Turkey without controversy and with much corporate money fueling hardworking scientists and volunteers. They are still logging the Tongass, drying up the Everglades, farming wetlands, cutting bottomland hardwood, whaling, felling rainforests and other things that we might think were "saved" or "stopped". Most other endangered species of the 70's are still endangered or are extinct. Fighting didn't work. Moreover, it backfired. The emotional appeals galvanized the other side, demonizing the environmentalists. Thus we have The Wise Use Movement, and other landowner rights advocates that wish to undo all we might wish to do. No good comes of this. Fortunately, conservation in this decade is turning to a more cooperative and productive style. Perhaps the generation that wanted to fight just got older and wiser and learned that the best way to get things done is to roll up your sleeves and work rather than scream. The Nature Conservancy, DU, the National Wild Turkey Federation, the Peregrine Fund and a few other habitat oriented groups have put their respective creatures in much better shape by buying habitat and working with not against the economic interests. Oil, as much as we use it, waste it, argue over it, fear it, fight for it, and fight against it, has never endangered any species. I spent a week on Prince William Sound two years ago and you cannot tell that it was ever the sight of a spill. All wildlife species recovered in the geologic time equivalent of an eye-blink. I spent a week on an oil rig in the Gulf that was as clean as a hospital. I am not supporting drilling in the Arctic here, I love the Arctic and hate the idea of development there. But I realize that the Arctic NWR will be drilled. Its not a matter of if, only when. I also am getting very chaffed at facade conservation organizations like Defenders and Hollywood types that speak for them that would not know a lemming or breeding Jaeger from a rat or pigeon. They exploit these situations for their own gain, rely on emotion, not on good science nor good strategy. Their goal is to get you upset and thus get your money. In doing so, they make it very difficult for those of us who are saving and restoring habitat. Defenders and their like don't save anything in the end but their 501c3 charters. Instead of fighting the tide, build a boat. Write your congressman in your words, not Ed Asner's, and ask him to make sure that the Arctic NWR drilling results in no net loss of wildlife. That means for every acre of habitat damaged, at least one acre should be put aside, restored or protected for wildlife somewhere that birds very much need it. What's more ask him to keep you informed so that you can see what is really going on with these issues rather than getting it all though the kaleidoscope filter of special interest lobbying groups. Paul Dickson -----Original Message----- From: James Beck [mailto:buteo(AT)WORLDNET.ATT.NET] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 1:58 PM To: LABIRD-L(AT)listserv.lsu.edu Subject: Fwd: Bush's 1st Big Hit - HELP! All, FYI from NEOORN. Please visit the site below for information and to sign the petition against drilling in Alaska. James >Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 05:05:04 -0500 >Reply-To: Bulletin Board for Ornithologists working with Neotropical >Birds <NEOORN-L(AT)listserv.lsu.edu> >Sender: Bulletin Board for Ornithologists working with Neotropical >Birds <NEOORN-L(AT)listserv.lsu.edu> >From: "Sebastian K. Herzog" <skherzog(AT)COMPUSERVE.COM> >Subject: Bush's 1st Big Hit - HELP! >To: NEOORN-L(AT)listserv.lsu.edu > >NEOORN: >sorry for possible cross-postings and that this does not have much to do >with neotropical >birds......but I think you will agree that it is of sad interest. > >Sebastian Herzog > >-------------Weitergeleitete Nachricht----------------- > >Von: "Patricia B. Caffrey", INTERNET:pcaffrey(AT)wwfbolivia.org >An: > "Sebastian Herzog", skherzog > >Datum: 12.02.101 15:59 > >BE: Bush's 1st Big Hit - HELP! > > > >Dear Friends, > >Please consider signing the petition to "Save the Artic Refuge". The >petition can be accessed as described below - enter the following website: >http://www.savearcticrefuge.org. > >This is a real threat! > >Best regards, > >Trish > >{ SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1}We're today launching a petition drive in support of >protecting the Arctic Refuge. > > This is our first use of the Internet technique of using what's called a >"flash" video > > cartoon in support of our cause. I thought you might enjoy seeing it. Ed >Asner was > > kind enough to narrate the cartoon. Besides putting pressure on the >Congress and > > White House, of course, another purpose is to build our list of email >names for the > > many battles ahead. That's why the it is a "viral" petition ... we want >folks to sign the > > petition and then send it on to their friends ... i.e. start what amounts >to a chain letter. > > We'll see how it works. > > > > A word of warning. If you have an older and therefore slower computer, >you may > > not be able to see the cartoon. Or, it may be only partially visible, and >Ed's voice > > indistinguishable. Let me know what you think. Best wishes -- Rodger > > > > ---------------------- > > **URGENT**: JOIN The Internet Campaign to Save the Arctic National >Wildlife > > Refuge from Big Oil! > > > > If you only help one environmental cause this year, please make it this >one! Be sure > > to forward the petition to your friends! > > > > Help us stop the big international oil companies from drilling in the >heart of America's > > most magnificent wildlife sanctuary, the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge >in Alaska. > > Often called "America's Serengeti", the Refuge is home to caribou, musk >oxen, polar > > bears, wolves, arctic foxes, millions of migratory birds and hundreds of >other animals. > > Oil drilling, construction activity and oil spills would inflict terrible >damage on the > > fragile arctic ecosystem and kill wildlife. The Refuge is also America's >most important > > onshore polar bear nursery ground. Polar bears would likely be driven from >their > > dens by the onslaught of aircraft, ships, trucks, road and pipeline >construction, and > > drilling -- possibly leaving their cubs to die. Oil development risks >another massive oil > > spill like the Exxon Valdez disaster. It simply isn't worth six months' >oil that wouldn't > > reach market for 10 years or more. > > > > To stop Big Oil, we need your help to demand that President Bush and >Congress > > NOT allow drilling in the Arctic Refuge. If we're to save the Refuge, we >need to > > make this the biggest Internet environmental petition ever. We need >millions of > > people to call for the Refuge to be protected from the devastation caused >by oil > > drilling. Insist that President Bush and Congress NOT allow drilling in >this unique > > Arctic wilderness -- one of the few truly wild places left. We should no >more allow > > drilling here than in Yellowstone Park or the Grand Canyon. > > > > We've created a special animated video at the cutting edge of Internet >technology, to > > assist the campaign to save the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. > > > > { HYPERLINK "http://www.defenders.org/arcticvideo;" }To view the video >and take action, click here: > > { HYPERLINK >"http://www.savearcticrefuge.org/video" }http://www.savearcticrefuge.org/vid >eo > > > > -or- > > > > To take action without viewing the video, click here: > > { HYPERLINK >"http://www.savearcticrefuge.org" }http://www.savearcticrefuge.org > > > > Whichever you do, please forward the message to friends and family who >share your > > desire to protect the environment. With millions of petitions, our >collective voice will > > be heard by decision-makers in Washington. > > > > > > >----------------------- Internet Header -------------------------------- >Sender: pcaffrey(AT)wwfbolivia.org >Received: from scbbs-bo.com (ns.scbbs.com.bo [166.114.154.21]) > by spdmgaaf.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-1.9) with ESMTP id > JAA02761 > for <skherzog(AT)compuserve.com>; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:59:31 -0500 (EST) >Received: from ns.scbbs-bo.com [166.114.154.21] by scbbs-bo.com > (SMTPD32-6.05) id A98DBDB200DA; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:57:16 -0400 >Received: FROM wwf BY ns.scbbs-bo.com ; Mon Feb 12 10:57:10 2001 -0400 >From: "Patricia B. Caffrey" <pcaffrey(AT)wwfbolivia.org> >To: "Stone-Jimenez Mary Anne" <mstone(AT)smtp.aed.org>, > "Specht Chelsea" <chelsea(AT)amnh.org>, > "Soltani Atossa" <asoltani(AT)igc.apc.org>, "Sohn John" <jsohn(AT)foe.org>, > "Smith Sara" <lwsara(AT)aol.com>, "Shelburne Family" > <DShelburne(AT)aol.com>, > "Seto Thelma" <tgseto(AT)hotmail.com>, > "Sebastian Herzog" <skherzog(AT)compuserve.com>, > "SBDA" <sbda(AT)mail.infonet.com.bo>, > "Samuels Lauren" <andrew.noss(AT)scbbs-bo.com>, > "Rob Glastra" <rglas(AT)hetnet.nl>, > "Quintela Carlos" <cequintela(AT)ecoq.com>, > "Quintela Blanca" <bquintela(AT)pluspetrol.com.ar>, > "PROMETA" <prometa(AT)olivo.tja.entelnet.bo>, > "PROCESO" <proceso-edu(AT)scbbs-bo.com>, > "Price Steve" <sprice(AT)wwfcanada.org>, > "Powell George" <gvnpowell(AT)hotmail.com>, > "Postero Nancy" <npostero(AT)igc.org>, > "Pinard Michelle" <m.a.pinard(AT)abdn.ac.uk>, > "Pendzich Christine" <CPendzich(AT)aol.com>, > "Paul Coopmans" <coopmans(AT)ecnet.ec>, > "Olson David" <David.Olson(AT)WWFUS.ORG>, > "Oviedo Gonzalo" <goviedo(AT)wwfnet.org> >Subject: Bush's 1st Big Hit - HELP! >Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:04:45 -0400 >Message-ID: <NEBBJGIEALMMMMMFMFKPKEHCCJAA.pcaffrey(AT)wwfbolivia.org> >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >X-Priority: 3 (Normal) >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 >Importance: Normal ________________________________________________________________ James Beck Metairie, LA buteo(AT)worldnet.att.net
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: Bush's 1st Big Hit - HELP! From: James Beck <buteo(AT)WORLDNET.ATT.NET> Date: 13 Feb 2001 4:20pm Okay, apparently I made a mistake forwarding this from NEOORN. I thought I put "FYI", and was not intending for a political ho-hum. I'm sure everyone has their political views, and how to fight habitat destruction, etc. I am not the founder nor initiator of Defenders, or whatever. Just passing along some information. Now, in the words of R.D. Purrington, "back to BIRDS....". James ________________________________________________________________ James Beck Metairie, LA buteo(AT)worldnet.att.net
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: Bush's, Thanks Paul From: Pat and Hubert Hervey <Patandhubert(AT)AOL.COM> Date: 13 Feb 2001 5:50pm ----INCLUDING text/plain MIME SECTION---- Thank you Paul Dickson for your common sense approach to saving environmentally sensitive areas. I have never liked the approach of so called tree-huggers, and those who let sentiment interfere with objectivity, where wild-life is concerned. Confrontation only leads to strengthening those forces whom one confronts. Compromise and agreement on saving the most important sites from development can accomplish much. Being a stewart of my land, and the creatures living on my land has long been a priority, nearly as important as making a living. Many farmers and land owners feel the same. Let us make a decent living, and wildlife will benefit also. Hubert Hervey, Stonewall, LA ----DELETED text/html MIME SECTION----
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Re: Mark Swan's Bullock Oriole From: Bill Wood <labirder(AT)SHREVE.NET> Date: 13 Feb 2001 7:07pm David, Labirders and all, I sure hope you weren't birding in Louisiana!!! Kidding aside, obviously you went birding out west, but where? So, is this a quiz or you going to just leave us hanging? I'm guessing southern California maybe. Continued great work on the LOS web site. At 09:36 AM 2/13/2001, you wrote: >Mark Swan's Bullock Oriole is now online and accessible from the LOS >homepage: http://losbird.org > >Sorry for the delay in posting his photos to the website, but I was off >birding this weekend. Let's see...Mountain Plover, Gray Flycatcher, >Hutton's Vireo, Red Crossbill, Cassin's Finch, Townsend's Solitaire, >Golden Eagle, Priairie Falcon, Costa's Hummingbird, etc. Oh yeah, and >Eurasian Collared-Dove. > >Regards, > >David J. L'Hoste
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: Bird Sightings - Time To Lighten UP?? From: "Jay V. Huner" <jjhuner(AT)MINDSPRING.COM> Date: 13 Feb 2001 9:38pm I saw several harbringers of spring today: 1. South Lafayette - Lafayette Parish, Louisiana - there was a flock of about 30 Cedar Waxwings feeding in a "blooming" tree several blocks from my home this morning. 2. UL Lafayette Farm - St. Martin Parish, Louisiana A. There were 6 Double-crested Cormorants and 2 Neotropic Cormorants feeding in our 14.4 acre crawfish pond today. The emergent vegetation has deteriorated to the point that there is a good bit of open water AND there are enough large crawfish to attract the cormorants. B. There is a flock of over 50 gulls - mostly Ring-billed Gulls but some Laughing Gulls - overflying my ponds every morning and feeding in the crawfish/wetland mitigation system just the north of our unit. Gulls and cormorants seem to show up when crawfish are molting in "early" spring. They are both chowing down on crawfish. C. There is a flock of about 120 American Coots on my main pond system. They show up as weather warms and may represent birds from further south staging for their trek to the north. D. There was a flock of about 15 Yellow-rumped Warblers "flycatching" from trees along the main drainage coulee (ditch to folks north of Bunkie) this afternoon. Wonder if the Lake Fausse Point State Park Ovenbird I saw Sunday was the first migrating warbler or a survivor of the winter? Good Birding, Jay Huner
[ << | >> | ^^ ] Subject: White-tailed Hawk IMMATURE at Welch dump From: Mark Swan <markruthswan(AT)EARTHLINK.NET> Date: 13 Feb 2001 10:45pm LABIRDERS I saw an 1st-winter White-tailed Hawk at the Welch dump this evening just after 5 PM, 13 Feb 2001. I talked to Phillip Wallace who told me that the WTHA he and others saw in December was an adult. The pictured bird appears to be a 1st winter bird. So what's going on? What's the chance that an stray immature would adopt the exact location that the stray adult had been using the last couple (or three?) winters? Assuming that adult was 1 bird. Are they nesting here?!? Anyone have any clues to this puzzle? Once again, I've e-mailed David L'Hoste some video for www.losbird.org Mark Swan Baton Rouge
[ Prev Day | Next Day | Calendar Month | LABIRD-L Info ]
Send feedback on these pages to: BMail@greatblue.com
B-Mail Message Content Disclaimer
Layout Copyright © 1999-2001 Great Blue Media Works
Last Updated: Tuesday, October 1, 2002 8:56pm MT